Introduction

 Why BEN?

 BEN Strategy

 MC & Structure

 Offices & Staff

 Membership

 Funders

 

 Introduction

 England

 Wales

 Scotland

 Annual Report

 BEN News

 

 General

 Publications

 Photos

 

 Introduction

 Training Pack

 

 BEN grants guide

 EMAS

 Grants News

 

 Green Spaces

 Features


Green Spaces Issue

Issue 2
'Are our open spaces representative of users - how is ethnic diversity expressed?'

We are grateful to the Institute of Landscape Design for giving us permission to put the article 'Global Village' by Care Rishbeth, Sheffield University, on the BEN website. The article first appeared in the journal 'Landscape Design' May 2002. If you which to explore landscape design further, go to their website www.landscape.co.uk


The landscape of the global village

What's the landscape equivalent of soy sauce, the Notting Hill Carnival and Bhagra?
Are our open spaces representative of users; ethnic diversity? Clare Rishbeth questions whether the landscape profession is rising to the challenge of a multi-cultural society.

Globalisation: bureaucracy, corporate takeovers and the glorification of the massive at the expense of the small and fragile. The profession of landscape architecture may rightly posture itself as the antithesis of this - people working with culturally-specific forms and natural patterns, striving to reflect the locally peculiar. Landscape architects often consider it important to be rooted geographically; we design to be site specific, but is this approach limited in only addressing one type of diversity -geographic diversity? That London is different from Edinburgh is important to us; climate, geology, built form and civic culture all inform different decisions to be made during the design process. Other aspects of distinctiveness, though, are less easy to define. This article approaches one of them - the issue of ethnic diversity.

Movement of people across borders and continents is no new phenomenon, but the explosion of travel, migration and international communication which has marked the last half century has irreversibly changed the citizenship and experience of cities today. If people and culture shape city form, the challenge is to enhance a local character that reflects the histories of both cities and city dwellers. Can such an acknowledgement of global influences relating to city life lead away from a stifling uniformity? On the micro-level of urban experience, walking through a cross-section of neighbourhoods in London, Manchester or Birmingham would offer a hopeful response. Local distinctiveness of place - though underpinned by a structure of building materials, scale of buildings and details of architecture - is most clearly described by the culture of its residents. People arrive, settle and produce their own culture - sari shops, Chinese supermarkets and Irish pubs are a tacit adaptation of a place for living. One neighbourhood is different from the next. The shops, eating establishments, and the events in community centres all lead the way to a complex embodiment of ethnic identities which have been transformed, transferred, fused together or set in contrast. In comparison, buildings and parts - the urban realm of the charge of environmental professionals - lag behind, seemingly deaf to this dialogue of multi-ethnic voices.

There are valid reasons why the ethnic influences that have started to enrich our media, our fashion, our food, our music, are not often found expressed in our public spaces. We value our built heritage as something special and threatened by fashionable whims. The relative permanence of city form tends to impose a requirement for longevity, a less immediate and accessible creativity than one in which products are quickly consumed and re-created. The public nature of a landscape architect's work requires a response to a democratically negotiated set of values. The inherent danger is that pleasing most of the people most of the time tends to maintain the status quo, rather than engendering change or supporting minority requirements.

People from ethnic minority groups have a range of experiences of living in Great Britain, some of which are significantly different from the majority white population. Within both these groups there are key differences with regard to feelings of national identity and of religious practice. The term 'ethnic minority groups' includes people born in the United Kingdom, but with parents of different ethnic backgrounds as well as first generation immigrants. A report from the Runnymead Trust states that, "All communities [minority and majority] are changing and complex, with internal diversity and disagreements." Despite the difficulty of terminology and definition, it is important to address the issues and impact of a multi-cultural society. A well intentioned 'colour-blindness' is not an adequate response if designed landscapes are to be inclusive. The situation is far from simple, with a range of social, cultural and environmental factors which need at least to be acknowledged - and many of which need to be addressed on a political as well as an individual level.

Ethnic diversity in park use

Should landscape architects make different design decisions with regard to the ethnic profile of users? What difference does this make to their work? Research has, in the past, tended to focus on environmental perception, questioning whether one group of people rates views for scenic value differently from another. In terms of ethnicity, these findings are contradictory. More pertinent, though, are the studies into the concept of place attachment - the importance of places as having cultural and symbolic value beyond their appearance. For immigrants, this underlies the importance of the physical landscape as a contribution to culture shock and the challenge of feeling 'settled' in a new country. A study into a range of factors which influenced the experience of transition by people who emigrated from the former Soviet Union to Israel, found that the strongest 'homesickness' was for the parks that people had left behind.(2) Another study discussed with a group of Asian women their use and perception of parks in South London and drew a link between using open space and a sense of the 'homeland'; the importance of open space both as a conduit for nostalgia and as a way of recognising familiarity in the new.'

More easily defined examples relate to differences in how groups and individuals use public open space. Research in the United States of America found significant differences in the patterns of use and qualities valued in Los Angeles parks by Hispanic, African American, Chinese and white users. (4) For example, the Hispanics tended to use the parks in large groups, brought picnics and rated the relaxing and social aspects most highly. Chinese people, however, were significantly absent from the parks, despite the many Chinese living locally. In discussion with the few Chinese users, the researchers found a discrepancy between the existing park design and the Chinese perception of an ideal park as an exquisite, beautiful space.

To acknowledge that cultural expectations of parks can influence both the value people place on different park attributes and patterns of preferred use is of vital importance to landscape architects. This may be a case of addressing specific barriers to full use and enjoyment of urban open space, or taking positive steps to allow multi-cultural influences to break into public spaces!

In recent years a number of programmes have addressed the issues of barriers to use of the countryside and of environmental activities in the UK by ethnic minority groups. A number of factors are cited, among them:
• low socio-economic factors, particularly the need to work long hours and low car ownership;
• negative experience of the British weather. This may seem a facile statement, but climate underpins the pattern of outdoor activities:
• a lack of information and awareness about the countryside;
• worries about getting lost and coming into contact with animals.

Black Environmental Network (BEN) has been instrumental in developing programmes in partnership with bodies such as the National Parks and the Youth Hostel Association to provide positive experiences of outdoor activities in the countryside. (5)

Anecdotal evidence seems to be variable regarding the use of urban parks by ethnic minority groups, and there has been no comprehensive study to help identify key issues. Some parks do attract a good range of users across ethnic groups, though the pattern and time of use may vary between these. Studies into issues of fear in urban settings point to higher levels of fear being expressed by ethnic minority groups, especially by women. Fear of racial attack or harassment cause people to modify their behaviour and may limit park use. For Muslims, there is also a need to avoid contact with dogs, a practical disincentive to using many parks. Wider themes regarding territory and sense of ownership -of articulating inclusion rather than taking it for granted - must also be regarded as important.

Design and management for a multi-cultural society

With regard to design style and activity provision, what aspects of today's parks and urban spaces need to evolve to better reflect the needs and aspirations of a multi-cultural society? The most obvious way by which landscape architects may try and be 'multi-cultural' is by the use of symbols in the landscape. Designers can create landscapes or landscape elements that identify a particular culture in a form that is open to a single interpretation. As a society, people are very adept at recognising a shape or pattern as representative of a culture or country, so we easily identify a Chinese pagoda, a mogul arch or a national flag. The most extreme form of this is epitomised by the theme park, which plays a facile game of 'spot the stereotype'. Creation of cultural landscapes in this way often exaggerates in order to communicate difference.

One urban example are Chinatowns - streets which are a collection of pagoda, ceremonial arches, dragon litter bins and pagoda telephone boxes. They are not realistic - streets are not actually like those in China - but a combination of effects signals 'China'. In parks and community gardens influences are often interpreted by artists, using mosaics, sculptures or patterns, which can be read as an emblem of a multi-cultural society, or reflect a nationality which is of particular significance. Designs which seek to recreate a traditional garden - for example Mogul or Japanese - also draw on our recognition of symbolic 'types', rather than reflect everyday landscapes in the respective countries.

Positive aspects of this approach are the ease of recognition and the clear message to members of the ethnic community concerned that they are acknowledged and welcome in the area. Skilled community artists or landscape architects can involve local people and draw on their interpretation of the forms and symbols which are important to them. Interventions can be made on a range of scales such as Victoria Park in Bradford - a mogul garden - or the plaques depicting different countries in pavement mosaics around Cardiff Arms Park Stadium, Wales. The difference between symbols which are 'self-produced' by ethnic groups or those which are produced by outsiders is a question relevant to the wider debate on the link between participation and successful design.

However, use of symbols and the construction of visual 'identities' is potentially problematic because of the literal nature of the cultural interpretation. They can re-enforce stereotypes and provide a caricature of a complex identity. Attention is focused on the superficial likeness of objects which can jar both with the original culture and local distinctiveness. Use of symbols can provoke strong emotional responses, and though this may increase a feeling of inclusion for some, other ethnic groups may feel excluded or marginalised (especially if there has been a tense history between the groups). Trying to articulate a multi-cultural situation (rather than one particular influence) requires particular skill to avoid a visually chaotic result.

Planting character

It is important not to limit our response to a multi-cultural society to the level of theme park design, and there are more subtle approaches that may effectively be used in landscape design and management. One is that of reflecting landscape character through planting - capturing an essence of a world region through selected plants. This is achieved most dramatically in the Eden Project, Cornwall and because a variety of non-native plants grow happily in Britain, multi-million pound biomes are not a necessity for a smaller scale effect. Plants can capture the character, scent and touch of another land, can tune into nostalgia and recognition as well as being enjoyable irrespective of these things. Good interpretation can have an educational importance, recognising that there is much in our soft landscape that is 'ethnically diverse'. Black Environmental Network has carried out projects with schools to create multi-cultural gardens through planting, and has compiled a list of suitable plants.

Recognising the diversity of park use could also be thought through with reference to the leisure patterns of ethnic minority groups. In many cities, successful allotment projects have been particularly set up for the use of different ethnic groups. As well as having nutritional and health benefits, food growing can echo use of open space in the home country and provide a stake of ownership in the new environment. Should sports facilities reflect national interests (cricket or football, tai-chi or rambling)? If many locals prefer to use parks in large groups eating picnics this should be reflected in the design of the space and seating provision Holding large and noisy multi-cultural music events in parks, and ensuring a range of food from different countries is available in park cafés, have both proved to be popular park management measures to attract more park use among ethnic minority groups. It is important to remember that there is no simple pattern of acculturation by ethnic groups, and the strength of this approach is that it can be inclusive and flexible. Ethnic diversity is not evident in the landscape professions. British students from ethnic minority groups are under-represented in landscape courses. No figures are available for the profession as a whole, but anecdotal evidence suggests that the vast majority of British practitioners are also white, though individual practices may be exceptions to this.

However, it is important that landscapes are designed and managed for a multi-cultural society. Compared to the medical, law and education sectors, the debate regarding inclusiveness of the landscape profession and its work is happily less prone to political flagwaving. That does not diminish its importance. The ethnic diversity of British citizens should be an opportunity for exciting new approaches which lead to stimulating and unusual public environments. If we dismiss it as tokenism, we may miss the chance to engage and contribute to an invigorating discussion regarding multi-cultural urban renewal.

References

  1. 'The Runnymead Trust, a community of communities and citizens - summary of the report by the Commission for the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain', London, 2000.
  2. Churchman, A., Mitrani, M. 'The role of the physical environment in culture shock.' Environment and behaviour (29), pp 64-86, 1997.
  3. Burgess, J., Harrison, C., Limb, M. 'People, parks and he urban green: a study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city', Urban studies (25), pp 455-473, 1988.
  4. Loukaitou-Sideris, A. 'Urban form and social context; cultural differentiation in the uses of urban parks', Journal of Planning Education and Research (14), pp 89-102, 1995.
  5. Black Environmental Network Web www.ben-network.org.uk

Download article here


Guidance Paper 2 - A sense of belonging

Black Environment Network - February`03

“The embodiment of spiritual and social feelings, and a sense of belonging for individuals and the communities are extremely important for ethnic communities. Attention must be given to these areas”

Manchester Green Spaces Focus Group

“I have been involved in the care, improvement and creation of green spaces. When I started, people thought I was doing it as part of community service - for doing some crime - they thought I was a criminal. But after a while when they saw me out there regularly they started to ask me what I was doing and taking an interest.”

Birmingham Green Spaces Focus Group

None of us would choose to go where we are made to feel that we do not belong. A green space is not an isolated island. It is part of the public realm, where anyone can go. Developing a sense of belonging means addressing the interface, not only between ethnic communities and those responsible for the green space, but also the ambience of the space created by all those who use it.

The picture given by the participants in the BEN Green Spaces Focus Groups shows us that there are many themes to be aware of when we proceed to address the layers of experience which promote a sense of belonging.

The first part of this paper flags up some of the themes to be addressed. The second part goes on to see what we may do.

Themes relating to a sense of belonging

Some themes to be aware of in relation to a sense of belonging:

1. Newcomers feeling like strangers or intruders
2. Being made unwelcome by others who use the space
3. The lack of features which recognise cultural diversity
4. Unfamiliar activities

Addressing the creation of a sense of belonging for members of ethnic communities

1. Newcomers feeling like strangers or intruders

This is especially true for individuals and groups which feel vulnerable. It is awkward for anyone to be in a space which is new to them. There is always a process of subtle social negotiation. This is all the more true if the green space is small, or even in a larger space if they are surrounded by others who use the space as their own and have established their use of the available areas at particular times for their activities.

Some ways forward:

  • Obvious presence of park wardens
  • Park wardens who can be purposefully aware of presence of vulnerable groups and take action to welcome and reassure them about the use of the green space - introduce themselves, talk to them in a friendly way, show them around the green space, talk about and invite them to activities they can join in with.
  • Outreach to ethnic community groups inviting them to take part in activities/clubs, and purposefully introducing them to people who will welcome them.
  • identifying the activities which particular ethnic groups would like to do and identifying a space and legitimised “booked” time for them .
  • Run events/festivals which enable different social groups from the whole community, the main white community and ethnic communities, to participate in organising it and to mix in a fun atmosphere. See Green Space of the Month. Abbeyfield Park, Sheffield on the BEN website.

2. Being made unwelcome by others who use the space

Sometimes there is the existence of individuals and groups which openly demonstrate that members of ethnic communities are unwelcome. This can at best be uncomfortable and at worst threatening. Vulnerable individuals and groups may simply not come back. Stronger individuals and groups may stick it out and find out the times when such undesirable people are not there and they can come and be left in peace. Another scenario may be that angry young ethnic minority people who no longer put up with being considered “not British” may hit back with words, or more unfortunately get into fights.

Some ways forward:

  • Visible presence of duty officers/wardens as reassurance, supporting them so that they do not give up and go away. When a situation involves only awkwardness, continued presence legitimised by wardens may bring acceptance.
  • Wardens/duty officers who are prepared to intervene and who are trained to deal with awkward situations.
  • Have a picture of the problem in relation to your neighbourhood. Talk to schools, youth clubs, social services and see if there are aspects which each can address.

3. The lack of features which recognise cultural diversity

There are clearly areas where the character of specific cultures is expressed through highly visible features, and we do not give this a second thought. Chinatowns in various cities are obvious examples. Besides being places which ethnic groups frequent, they have become a focus for the general population to access culturally defined pastimes... strolling around enjoying the different ambience, eating, browsing in shops for entertainment and buying “curios”. In areas where particular ethnic groups run their businesses, the shop signs in different languages, the choice of colours for shopfronts, the decorative elements - these all give flavour and character to an area. Many ethnic minority people see these areas as real Comfort Zones, enjoying places which have visible features which recognise their presence in society, and which provide cultural links to their countries of origin...a mixture of pride and nostalgia.

But, beyond these areas, there is a need for more awareness of appropriate opportunities to cultural recognition through creating new artefacts which express the recognition of cultural presence in multi-cultural Britain.

  • Some ways forward:
  • Commissioning new artwork from a range of cultures in a green space.
  • Using green space for the temporary exhibition of artwork from different cultures.
  • Drawing attention to the many features taken for granted as common features of British parks, identifying them as having their origin in other cultures, and interpreting them to demonstrate the relationship of Britain to other countries, e.g. pavilions, pagodas, fountains.
  • Using green space for culturally orientated activities, e.g. identifying a space for Chinese elderly to do Tai Chi early in the morning, ensuring a feeling of safety through the presence of a warden.
  • Identify if possible areas in your green space in which you can create spaces which focus on cultural aspects, with links to the countries of origin of local ethnic groups and which introduce and create interest for the main white population. e.g. Multi-cultural gardens in a public park. See Green Space of the Month, Chumleigh Gardens. Southwark on the BEN website.
  • Plants are features too. Some ethnic groups long to see features, including plants, which have a spiritual meaning. Identify places where you may be able to develop new planting and involve them in identifying plants which have cultural or spiritual meanings. Planting these with them will support the creation of a sense of ownership and belonging.
  • Ethnic groups love to be enabled to grow fresh herbs and vegetables from their country of origin. Allotments can reach out to ethnic groups to offer an opportunity and link with the many allotments which already have many different ethnic groups participating and who sometimes run a seed sharing scheme.
  • Some green spaces may be able to find a patch of ground for ethnic groups to grow herbs or vegetables from their country of origin. Some spaces have put up greenhouses to extend the range of things which it is possible to grow.

4. Unfamiliar activities

Belonging to a place is about being there and doing things. Increase the range of activities which ethnic groups may do. Green spaces may have activities which are unfamiliar to particular ethnic groups, or which are too expensive for them to access.

Some ways forward:

  • Do some outreach work to interest ethnic groups in a range of activities and fund a taster programme. Schemes such as those run by Sport England are keen to support efforts to involve newcomers in various sports.
  • Once ethnic community groups are really interested, if they cannot afford to continue, the fact that need is established means they can be assisted to identify funds which will support such programmes of activities, e.g. Awards for All will give up to £5000 for activities for disadvantaged groups.
  • Support ethnic community groups to gain the capacity to organise programmes of activities related to your green space and to access funding, perhaps together with you, to implement them.
  • Link to other green spaces, which can share expertise and opportunities for ethnic participation.
  • Enthuse them to address ethnic inclusion. Bounce off each other's efforts and expertise to involve ethnic communities with green spaces.

5. Monitoring and evaluation

In general, monitor your progress and involve members of the ethnic communities to work with you in increasing their sense of belonging in relation to using your green space. It is an important basis for all the different levels of involvement, from use for your space to its care and improvement.

Your work will contribute not only to an increasing involvement by ethnic groups with your space, but to social cohesion. It will not only benefit the lives of ethnic groups, but ultimately release their missing contribution.

Useful information

Ethnic Communities and Involvement in Green Spaces -BEN Focus Group. Birmingham. Click for link on BEN website. www.ben-network.org.uk

See the many interesting examples on green spaces in relation to ethnic communities on “Green Space of the Month” on the BEN website in the Participation section. In particular, as mentioned in this paper:

  • Abbeyfield Park. Sheffield
  • Chumleigh Gardens. Southwark

General information on ethnic environmental participation. See Resources section of the BEN website for many downloadable items including:

  • Roots Culturfest
  • Ethnic Environmental Youth Work
  • “Working with disadvantaged groups on environmental projects - some guidelines”

There are many courses relating to community development and building relationships with target groups, e.g. look at the training programmes of NCVO.

For advice, consultancy on action plans, training and developmental support relating to working within the physical environment:

  • Neighbourhood Initiatives Foundation www.nif.co.uk
  • Black Environment Network (see Training section on BEN website)

[See Birmingham Focus Group Report]

Download article here

Green Spaces | Features



Please click here to return to the Front Page
Please click here if you would like to complete the Feedback form

Green Spaces
Issues

Issue 1>
Issue 2>
Issue 3>
Issue 4>
Issue 5>
Issue 6>
Issue 7>
Issue 8>
Issue 9>
Issue 10>
Issue 11>
Issue 12>

Green Space
Projects

Home>

March 2005>
February 2005>
January 2005>
December 2004>
November 2004>
October 2004>
September 2004>
August 2004>
July 2004>
June 2004>
May 2004>
April 2004>
March 2004>
February 2004>
January 2004>
December 2003>
November 2003>
October 2003>
September 2003>
August 2003>
July 2003>
June 2003>
May 2003>
April 2003>
March 2003>
Feb 2003>
Jan 2003>
Dec 2002>
Nov 2002>
Oct 2002>
Sept 2002>
Aug 2002>
July 2002>
June 2002>
May 2002>
April 2002>

BEN UK Office
1st Floor
60 High Street
Llanberis
Wales
LL55 4EU

Tel
0207 9214339

email BEN

Black Environment Network logo
Black Environment Network logo
Black Environment Network logo